I enjoyed Ginzburg’s The Cheese
and the Worms; it is an interesting take on the ideas of religion and the
afterlife. The portion of the book that I found of interest is Menocchios’ idea
that paradise was the equivalent to a feast. It seems that this plain miller
could grasp concepts from different religions and use them to understand his
own religion. While those who were committed to the Catholic standards could
not allow for this depiction of heaven or paradise, I can understand how
Menocchio would perceive this concept.
Menocchio tells
the inquisitors that “Paradise is a feast – the end of work, the negation of
daily toil” (72) which is easy to understand. Menocchio and the people that he
surrounded himself with were people who toiled at work without much return for
that work. To imagine that paradise is a feast with an abundance of food and
drink is not that foreign an idea, because paradise is that which we can’t
access on a daily basis.
I would also like
to comment on the way that Ginzburg writes which makes this much more
accessible compared to Montaillou. By focusing strictly on Mennochio, and not
on such a wide group of people I feel that I can better understand what he was
going through. With Montaillou I spent a significant amount of time getting
lost in the “family tree” which took up a big portion of the book, whereas with
The Cheese and the Worms I felt like
I could concentrate more on the concepts.
No comments:
Post a Comment